vendredi 31 mars 2023

IT management frameworks assessment (chats with ChatGPT) - chat N°2 [march 2023]

Introduction

This chat belongs to the series "IT management framworks assessment (chats with ChatGPT)" which is an attempt to design a 360 IT management framework. 



 

The present chat attempts to design an IT life cycle which would structure the 360 IT management framework.  

The starting point happened to fall on ITIL®, an IT management framework edited by Axelos Limited, UK. 

Notes (marked with brackets []) have been added later, after the closing of the chat.

IT management frameworks assessment (chats with ChatGPT) - chat N°1 [march 2023]

Hello ChatGPT, how about continuing this interesting chat ?


Of course! I'm here to help with any questions or topics you have in mind. What would you like to talk about?

When designing an IT management framework, the IT life cycle pattern is key.
It helps IT professionals and non IT professionals to meet at certain point of an IT project and decide upon the next steps.



Yes, that's absolutely true! 

An IT life cycle framework provides a standardized approach to managing IT projects and services, and it can help align IT with business objectives, improve service quality, and increase efficiency.

By breaking down an IT project or service into a series of phases, it becomes easier for IT professionals and stakeholders from other departments to communicate and collaborate effectively. Each phase of the life cycle has a specific goal, set of activities, and deliverables, which makes it easier for everyone involved to understand what is expected and what their role is in the process.

Additionally, the IT life cycle framework provides a way to track progress, identify and mitigate risks, and ensure that the final product or service meets the required quality standards. Overall, it helps ensure that the IT project or service is delivered on time, within budget, and meets the needs of the business.

How about this one, with 8 verbs,
Plan, Organize, Acquire, Implement, Deliver, Support, Monitor, Evaluate ? [2]


That's a great list of verbs to describe the phases of an IT life cycle framework! Here's a brief overview of what each phase entails:
  • Plan: This phase involves defining the goals and objectives of the IT project or service, identifying the scope, and developing a plan to achieve those goals.
  • Organize: In this phase, the resources required for the project or service are identified and allocated, and the team responsible for delivering the project or service is assembled.
  • Acquire: This phase involves procuring any hardware, software, or other resources required for the project or service.
  • Implement: This phase involves the actual development and deployment of the IT project or service.
  • Deliver: This phase involves the release and delivery of the IT project or service to the end-users or customers.
  • Support: In this phase, ongoing support and maintenance of the IT project or service is provided to ensure that it continues to meet the needs of the business.
  • Monitor: This phase involves monitoring the performance and health of the IT project or service to ensure that it is meeting its goals and objectives.
  • Evaluate: This final phase involves evaluating the success of the IT project or service and identifying any areas for improvement or future development.
Overall, this list of verbs provides a clear and concise way to describe the different phases of an IT life cycle framework.

This pattern has been designed by an international professional organisation based in USA.


There are several IT management frameworks that have been developed by international professional organizations based in the USA. Some of the most well-known ones include:
  • Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) [1]: This is a framework that provides a set of best practices for managing IT services. It focuses on aligning IT services with the needs of the business and improving service quality.
  • Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT): This framework provides a set of best practices for IT governance and management. It focuses on aligning IT with business objectives, managing risks, and ensuring compliance with regulations.
  • Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): This is a framework that provides a set of best practices for project management. It covers all aspects of project management, including planning, execution, monitoring and control, and closing.
  • Agile: This is an iterative and incremental approach to software development that emphasizes collaboration, flexibility, and customer satisfaction. It involves breaking down a project into smaller, manageable chunks and delivering working software in short iterations.
These frameworks have been widely adopted by organizations around the world and have proven to be effective in improving IT performance, reducing costs, and increasing customer satisfaction.

The pattern " Plan, Organize, Acquire, Implement, Deliver, Support, Monitor, Evaluate" has been more adopted by one of the four frameworks you quote above.
Which one ?


The pattern "Plan, Organize, Acquire, Implement, Deliver, Support, Monitor, Evaluate" is not directly associated with any of the four frameworks I mentioned earlier [2]. However, it does share some similarities with the ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library) framework.

The ITIL framework is a widely adopted set of best practices for managing IT services. The framework consists of several stages, including:
  • Service Strategy
  • Service Design
  • Service Transition
  • Service Operation
  • Continual Service Improvement
The stages in the ITIL framework are not exactly the same as the phases in the "Plan, Organize, Acquire, Implement, Deliver, Support, Monitor, Evaluate" pattern, but there are some similarities. For example, the Service Design stage in the ITIL framework is focused on planning and designing IT services, which is similar to the "Plan" phase in the pattern. The Service Transition stage involves implementing and delivering IT services, which is similar to the "Implement" and "Deliver" phases in the pattern. Finally, the Continual Service Improvement stage involves monitoring and evaluating IT services, which is similar to the "Monitor" and "Evaluate" phases in the pattern.

Overall, while the "Plan, Organize, Acquire, Implement, Deliver, Support, Monitor, Evaluate" pattern is not directly associated with any of the four frameworks I mentioned earlier, it does share some similarities with the ITIL framework.

Where would you place "Acquire" in the ITIL framework ?


In the ITIL framework, the process of acquiring IT resources is typically part of the Service Strategy and Service Design stages.

During the Service Strategy stage, the organization defines its overall strategy and objectives for delivering IT services. This includes identifying the resources and capabilities that are needed to deliver those services, as well as any gaps in the organization's current resources that need to be filled.

During the Service Design stage, the organization plans and designs the IT services that will be offered to customers. This includes defining the requirements for the resources that will be needed to deliver those services, and determining how those resources will be acquired.

The "Acquire" phase in the "Plan, Organize, Acquire, Implement, Deliver, Support, Monitor, Evaluate" pattern is similar to these stages in the ITIL framework, as it focuses on identifying the resources needed to deliver IT services and acquiring those resources. However, it is important to note that the specific processes and activities involved in acquiring IT resources may vary depending on the organization and the nature of the IT services being offered.

As you say, ITIL defines Service Strategy, Service Design, Service Transition, Service Operation, Continual Service Improvement.
It is all about service.
Where does the activity "acquire IT equipment" fit in the ITIL framework ?


In the ITIL framework, acquiring IT equipment would generally be considered part of the Service Design stage, which focuses on designing IT services that meet the needs of the business and its customers.

More specifically, the process of acquiring IT equipment would typically fall under the Service Design process known as Service Asset and Configuration Management (SACM). This process involves identifying, tracking, and managing the IT assets and configurations that are needed to deliver IT services.

As part of SACM, the organization would establish policies and procedures for acquiring new IT equipment, such as servers, storage devices, and network devices. This might involve defining the technical specifications for the equipment, identifying potential vendors or suppliers, evaluating different options, and selecting the equipment that best meets the organization's needs.

Once the equipment has been acquired, it would be tracked and managed as part of the overall IT asset and configuration management process. This might include maintaining an inventory of all IT assets, documenting their configuration and relationships to other assets, and ensuring that they are properly maintained and serviced throughout their lifecycle.

If i understand you well, ITIL focuses on IT service, not on IT assets.



That's correct. 

While IT assets such as hardware, software, and infrastructure are important components of IT service delivery, ITIL is primarily focused on the design, delivery, and management of IT services that meet the needs of the business and its customers.

ITIL defines a service as "a means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks." This means that ITIL is concerned with defining, designing, delivering, and managing IT services that help the business achieve its goals and meet the needs of its customers, rather than simply acquiring and managing IT assets.

Of course, IT assets are an important part of delivering IT services, and ITIL includes processes and activities for managing IT assets and configurations as part of the overall service management lifecycle. However, the primary focus of ITIL is on service management, rather than asset management.

If i understang you well, there are two levels, the "service level" and the "asset level" ?


Yes, that's correct.

The service level refers to the design, delivery, and management of IT services that meet the needs of the business and its customers. ITIL is primarily focused on this service level, and provides a framework for managing the entire service management lifecycle, from strategy and design through to operation and continual improvement.

The asset level refers to the hardware, software, and other components that are used to deliver IT services. While IT assets are an important part of delivering IT services, they are not the primary focus of ITIL. However, ITIL does include processes and activities for managing IT assets and configurations as part of the overall service management lifecycle.

In summary, ITIL provides a framework for managing IT services at the service level, and includes processes and activities for managing IT assets as part of the overall service management lifecycle.

I am tempted to design a two levels framework
Level 1
  • Service Strategy
  • Service Design
  • Service Transition
  • Service Operation
  • Continual Service Improvement
Level 2
  • Asset Strategy
  • Asset Design
  • Asset Transition
  • Asset Operation
  • Continual Asset Improvement
would you think that this framework would be more efficient to help IT professionals and non IT professional discussing and concur to decisions during steering comittees ?



Designing a two-level framework with a focus on both IT services and assets could certainly be useful in certain situations, particularly if the organization places a high value on IT assets and wants to ensure they are effectively managed and aligned with the business needs.

However, it's important to keep in mind that adding a second level to the framework could also add complexity and potentially confuse non-IT stakeholders who may not be as familiar with IT asset management. Additionally, it's important to consider how the two levels would be integrated and how decisions and actions at one level may impact the other.

Overall, whether or not a two-level framework would be more efficient depends on the specific needs and goals of the organization. It may be worth considering different options and discussing with stakeholders to determine the most effective approach.

 

Notes :
[1] ITIL® is a (registered) Trade Mark of Axelos Limited, UK. All rights reserved.  
[2] Plan & Organize, Acquire & Implement, Deliver & Support, Monitor & Evaluate is the pattern adopted by Cobit 4, a IT management framework edited by ISACA, USA. Cobit is a registered trade mark of ISACA. 



DISCLAIMER
This content is provided by OpenAI and Tru Do-Khac and is intended for educational or informational purposes only, and to not use it for any commercial purposes without proper licensing.
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.



For additional information : Sharing and publication policy, OpenAI.


Agile team ideal size (chat with ChatGPT) [may 2023]
IT management frameworks assessment (chat with ChatGPT) [march 2023]
IT management frameworks assessment (chat with ChatGPT) [march 2023]
ChatGPT coding practices capabilities [march 2023]
ChatGPT code in python, C and C# [fev 2023]

Nominations 2014 et 2015

La pédagogie "Short MOOCs en Réseau" a été retenue par la plateforme d'innovation ouverte de l'association Pacte PME recherchant pour le compte d'une entreprise membre un outil innovant de transformation numérique des ressources humaines.

L'innovation frugale du "Personal MOOC" a été élue Trophée IT Innovation Forum 2015.